Any transport mode · Incoterms 2020

EXW Incoterm: Ex Works (Incoterms 2020)

Minimum seller obligation — the buyer runs the entire journey from the seller's door.

EXW at a glance

Under EXW the seller simply makes the goods available at its own premises (or another named place). The buyer handles everything from that point: loading, export clearance, all transport, import and delivery.

Full term
EXW — Ex Works
Transport mode
Any transport mode
Delivery point
Seller's premises or another named place — goods made available, not loaded
Risk transfers
When the goods are placed at the buyer's disposal at the named place
Export clearance
Buyer
Import clearance
Buyer

What EXW means in practice

EXW is the shortest possible journey for the seller. Once the goods are packed and sitting at the agreed place — usually the seller's factory or warehouse — the seller has done its job. The buyer collects them, loads them, clears them for export, moves them across the world and clears them into the destination country.

That sounds attractively simple for sellers and attractively cheap for buyers, but EXW is widely considered the most misused of all eleven rules. The buyer must complete export formalities in the seller's country, which many buyers cannot legally or practically do without a local agent. And because delivery happens before loading, even the forklift movement onto the collection truck is, strictly speaking, at the buyer's risk.

In practice, many transactions labelled EXW behave like FCA — the seller loads the truck and often assists with export paperwork as a courtesy. The problem is that a courtesy is not an obligation: if the goods are damaged during loading, or an export declaration is filed incorrectly, the contract wording rarely matches what actually happened. If the seller is going to load and handle export clearance anyway, FCA usually reflects reality more honestly.

Buyer vs seller responsibilities

Who does what under EXW
TaskResponsible
Packaging & export markingSeller
Loading at originBuyer — Even at the seller's premises, loading is formally the buyer's task under EXW — a frequent source of dispute.
Pre-carriage (inland transport, origin)Buyer
Export clearanceBuyer — The seller must provide assistance and information at the buyer's request, but the declaration itself is the buyer's problem.
Origin terminal handlingBuyer
Main international transportBuyer
Cargo insuranceBuyer — Neither party is obliged to insure. The buyer carries transit risk from collection, so cover is normally arranged in the buyer's interest.
Import clearanceBuyer
Import duties & taxesBuyer
Delivery to final destinationBuyer
Unloading at destinationBuyer

Seller / Buyer indicates which party normally bears the cost and organises the task under this rule. Individual contracts can and often do vary the details — the table shows the default starting point, not a substitute for contract wording.

Where costs transfer — and where risk transfers

Cost transfer

Cost transfer under EXW is brutally early: from the moment the goods are made available at the named place, every subsequent cost belongs to the buyer — loading, trucking, export declaration fees, terminal charges, freight, insurance (if taken), import duty, delivery.

Buyers comparing an EXW quote against a DAP or DDP quote should build a full landed-cost model before concluding EXW is cheaper. The low invoice price simply moves the logistics bill onto the buyer's side of the ledger, where it may be higher or lower depending on the buyer's freight rates and origin-country capabilities.

Risk transfer

Risk transfers at the same early point as cost: when the goods are placed at the buyer's disposal, unloaded, at the named place. If the collection truck crashes a kilometre from the seller's gate, that is the buyer's loss.

Note the loading trap: because risk passes before loading, damage that occurs while the seller's own staff load the buyer's truck sits in a grey zone unless the contract allocates it explicitly. This is one of the few rules where cost and risk transfer at the same point — the complications come from how early that point is, not from any split between the two.

When EXW works well

  • The buyer has a freight forwarder or logistics network in the seller's country that can legally handle export formalities there.
  • Domestic or intra-market purchases (for example within a single customs union) where no export declaration is required and EXW behaves like a simple pickup.
  • Experienced buyers consolidating purchases from several suppliers in one origin country into a single export shipment.
  • Situations where the buyer specifically wants full visibility and control of every cost element from the factory gate.

When to think twice about EXW

  • The buyer has no presence or agent in the seller's country — export clearance can become legally awkward or impossible.
  • Letter-of-credit transactions: the buyer controls the transport documents, which rarely satisfies L/C requirements from the seller's perspective.
  • Sellers who need proof of export for VAT/tax purposes — under EXW the evidence sits in the buyer's hands, which can put the seller's zero-rating at risk.
  • Any transaction where the seller will, in reality, load the truck and file the export declaration — FCA matches that reality with clearer risk allocation.

EXW in the real world

UK importer buying machine parts EXW from Poland

A UK engineering firm agrees to buy precision components from a factory in Katowice, Poland, at an attractive "EXW Katowice (Incoterms 2020)" price. The buyer's forwarder arranges collection, but on the day, the factory's forklift driver loads the pallets — and one pallet is dropped and damaged.

Formally, loading was the buyer's responsibility and risk. The factory argues the damage happened after delivery had taken place; the buyer argues the seller's staff caused it. The parties settle, but only after weeks of friction — and the buyer discovers it also needs a Polish fiscal representative to act as exporter of record for the customs declaration, a cost never included in its landed-cost comparison.

On the next contract, the parties switch to FCA Katowice: the seller loads at its own risk and files the export declaration, for a modest price increase that is far smaller than the friction it removes.

Common mistakes with EXW

Assuming the seller handles export clearance

Under EXW the buyer is responsible for export formalities. Many buyers only discover at collection that they cannot act as exporter of record in the seller's country without a local agent or fiscal representative.

Treating the EXW price as the cheapest option

The invoice price is lower because the buyer inherits every logistics cost. Without a full landed-cost calculation, EXW routinely turns out more expensive than a well-negotiated FCA or FOB deal.

Ignoring the loading grey zone

Risk passes before loading. If the seller's staff load the truck anyway — which happens on most real EXW collections — damage during loading is contested territory unless the contract allocates it.

Sellers using EXW while still needing export evidence

A seller that zero-rates its sale for VAT typically needs proof the goods left the country. Under EXW that proof belongs to the buyer's process, and chasing it after the fact is a recurring pain point.

TradeIntel insight

In procurement reviews, EXW quotes are often a signal rather than a strategy: suppliers quote EXW when they want zero logistics involvement, not because it serves the buyer. If you hold competitive freight rates at origin, EXW can genuinely work in your favour — but price the export-formalities workaround first. If you cannot name who will act as exporter of record in the seller's country, that is usually the moment to negotiate FCA instead.

Is EXW right for your shipment?

Answer eight questions about your shipment and capability profile — the TradeIntel Incoterms Assessment explains which rules fit and why.

Check with the Incoterms Assessment

Frequently asked questions

Who is responsible for loading the truck under EXW?

The buyer — even when collection happens at the seller's premises. If the seller agrees to load in practice, the contract should say whether the seller loads at the buyer's risk or its own, because the rule itself puts loading risk on the buyer.

Who handles export customs clearance under EXW?

The buyer arranges and pays for export clearance, with the seller obliged only to assist with information. This is the single biggest practical problem with EXW in cross-border trade, because many buyers cannot act as exporter of record in a foreign country.

Is EXW the cheapest Incoterm for buyers?

The invoice price is usually the lowest, but the buyer takes on every logistics and customs cost from the seller's door. Whether the total landed cost beats an FCA or FOB alternative depends entirely on the buyer's freight rates and origin-country capabilities.

When does risk pass from seller to buyer under EXW?

When the goods are placed at the buyer's disposal at the named place, before loading. From that moment, loss or damage — including during loading and the entire journey — is the buyer's problem.

Should EXW be used for international container shipments?

Usually not. For cross-border shipments most practitioners prefer FCA, which keeps export clearance with the seller and creates a clean risk handover to the buyer's carrier. EXW works best domestically or where the buyer has a genuine operational presence at origin.

Related Incoterms guidance

Reviewed for practical procurement and logistics relevance by TradeIntel.

TradeIntel provides educational decision support and does not provide legal, tax, customs or contractual advice. Incoterms should be incorporated into a complete sales contract with a precisely named place or port.